No one said it would be easy, that’s for darn sure.  After first being dismissed by an Obama appointed judge, according to The Gateway Pundit, Trump’s team has now filled an important appeal to the verdict.  If they can flip this decision, it would certainly move the odds … a lot.

The Gateway Pundit reported:

President Trump’s legal team filed an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Sunday after Judge Matthew Brann dismissed their lawsuit seeking to block Pennsylvania from certifying its results.

As reported Saturday night, US District Judge of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Matthew Brann on Saturday dismissed a Trump campaign lawsuit seeking to block Pennsylvania from certifying its election results.

Judge Brann, an Obama appointee torched Trump’s legal team and accused them of asking the Court to “disenfranchise almost 7 million voters.”

The Trump campaign argued the equal protection clause, however the Obama judge shot back and said, “That some counties may have chosen to implement the guidance (or not), or to implement it differently, does not constitute an equal protection violation.”

President Trump’s legal team responded to Brann’s ruling and last night:

“Today’s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the US Supreme Court. Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we’re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock,” Rudy Giuliani, Attorney to Trump and Jenna Ellis, Senior Legal Advisor to Trump 2020 Campaign wrote.

“There is so much evidence that in Pennsylvania, Democrats eliminated our opportunity to present 50 witnesses and other evidence that election officials blatantly ignored Pennsylvania’s law denying independent review. This resulted in 682,777 ballots being cast illegally, wittingly or unwittingly. This is just an extension of Big Tech, Big Media, Corrupt Democrat censorship of damning facts the American public needs to know.

“We are disappointed we did not at least get the opportunity to present our evidence at a hearing. Unfortunately the censorship continues. We hope that the Third Circuit will be as gracious as Judge Brann in deciding our appeal one way or the other as expeditiously as possible. This is another case that appears to be moving quickly to the United States Supreme Court.”’

Again, we are not claiming that there was or was not fraud.  With the level of faith I have in the United Stated government and it’s contractors, nothing would surprise me.  However, for the record, I have seen no hard evidence of fraud, so I can not say that it exists.  I do think the case is important enough to be heard in a court of law though …

Mark Sidney

Mark Sidney is a father, husband and advocate for a return to Constitutional governance. He now lives with his family in the South after fleeing the People's Republic of New Jersey.

View all posts


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • “Again, we are not claiming that there was or was not fraud. ”

    You need to grow a pair and man up, the evidence of fraud is overwhelming.

    Reporters who are too scared/complicit to call it like it is are the reason criminals in America are able to carry out their Malfeasance and voter fraud.

  • Our only hope is that the Supreme court will have enough honest Justices to make our president the official winner, which he is, of this election. But I feel cannot count on Kavanaugh, he has proven to be another Roberts, the scum bag after Trump fought for him. Korsuch Is questionable , in my opinion, and Amy is ??? so we have 3 that will vote the way of the constitution for sure and one who won’t and two that can go either way. Pray as hard as you ever had.