Lawrence David| Opinion| ICYMI 6/27/20| Yesterday, in an attempt to give the benefit of the doubt to former President Obama, and because US attorney Michael Sherwin’s letter accompanying the release of Agent Peter Strzok’s notes only fixed the date between January 3 and January 5, 2017, we built our article around the notes being taken on January 4th.

That allowed Obama some plausible deniability regarding his involvement in what is now known to be a fraudulent investigation of incoming National Security Advisor Lt. General Michael Flynn.

After we posted our article, Attorney General William Barr clarified the date of Strzok’s notes to be January 5th… after the infamous White House meeting that included a who’s who from the highest levels of the intelligence community:

President Barack Obama

Vice President Joe Biden

National Security Advisor Susan Rice

Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates

CIA Director John Brennan

FBI Director James Comey

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper

In that light, let’s listen to the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, Devin Nunes (R-CA) review Strzok’s notes one more time…

Then as presented by Flynn’s attorney, Sidney Powell…

VP = Vice President Biden, P = President Obama, D = FBI Director Comey

The day after the FBI’s Washington field office recommended closing the counterintelligence investigation against Flynn, Director Comey tells everyone involved that the intercepts of incoming Trump’s NSA Michael Flynn’s with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak appear legit.

So, why did Obama tell Comey to “make sure you look over things and have the right people on it,” after  his agency had already investigated Flynn’s legitimate involvement with Russia, over a period of months only to conclude there seemed to be no there, there? 

And, why did wannabe president Joe Biden bring up the Logan Act when, as incoming NSA, Flynn was responsible for maintaining U.S.-Russian relations and Comey said Flynn’s conversations were legit?  

Here’s AG Barr informing us that the handwritten notes were a product of the January 5th meeting…

In reviewing the recently releases notes, former U.S. attorney Brett Tolman told Friday “Fox & Friends” this morning:

“That should concern everyone that they still, somehow, found a way to manipulate a case and bring it when they deemed his underlying action as being legitimate.” 

“Why does he do it? Because there is an absolute effort – call it collusion, conspiracy, whatever you want to say — that now we know goes as high as the vice president and the president. To not only withhold information about the investigation to the incoming president, but to go after the incoming president through their incoming national security adviser on an investigation that did not have a foundation to it.” 

“That’s why they continued to prosecute him. Because they were doing what they could to try to prevent Donald Trump from getting into the Oval Office.”

(CBN News) CBN News Political Analyst David Brody sat down for an exclusive interview with President Donald Trump Monday at the White House. 

The following is the transcript from one segment of the interview. 

David Brody: On Obama and the spying situation, this idea that they were spying on your campaign, you’ve been asked before about what crime would have been potentially been committed.

President Trump: Treason 

18 U.S. Code § 2384.Seditious conspiracy


Mark Siidney

Father, Husband, Son. Mark is just a regular guy from a blue color family who writes opinion articles. Mark has Economics & Political Science degrees from Rutgers University.

View all posts

Add comment