Just when you thought the ‘you’re racist’ police could not get any more absurd, they do exactly that with their attacks on the honorable Judge Amy Coney Barrett.

[Opinion] I could be wrong, but I thought that the definition of feminism was equality with men, being able to work hard while also having a social life, and supporting other women.

The handling of SCOTUS nominee Amy Barrett by feminists, however, is showing that I couldn’t be more wrong.

If you go by how the radical feminist movement is treating Barrett, the new definition of feminism is “women supporting women unless that woman is a conservative- then attack her in full force.” It’s sad really, and quite pathetic.

We all knew the Left was going to go after Barrett as soon as she was officially nominated, but they’re really grasping at straws. The radical feminism movement has gone after her appearance, her faith, and accusing her of being “bad for women” because of her stance on abortion. They’ve also gone after her for wondering how on earth a Supreme Court Justice could also be a good mother.

Aren’t feminists supposed to be able to do it all? Isn’t that the thrust of the movement?

As we’ve seen, it apparently only applies to liberal and Democratic women. Barrett should be praised for her hard work, dedication, and strength. She has seven kids, two of which are adopted, and one of which has special needs.

Instead of hailing her as a hero, however, the left is going after her for having adopted African American children. Seriously?

Author Ibram Kendi went after them on Twitter saying, “Some White colonizers ‘adopted’ Black children. They ‘civilized’ these ‘savage’ children in the ‘superior’ ways of White people, while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of denial, while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity,” according to Fox.

Celebrities took to their Twitter accounts to go after Barrett as well, many of which are women. The same women that are angry about Barrett wanting to overturn  Roe v. Wade and messing up the universal health care system. Two things that will actually be better and safer  for women in the long run.

Radical Feminists are trying to destroy a woman who should be hailed as an icon for her work as a loving and kind mother who doubles as a hard-working woman. It really shows how desperate they are. There really isn’t anything you can go after Barrett or her family for, so women have to create or find something.

It really is pathetic that the radical feminism movement can’t rally around her. There are so many Ruth Bader Ginsburg quotes where she said how we should respect one another despite differing views. Then she passed away, as is what happens to all people at some point in their life, and her very supporters have gone after her replacement viciously, ignoring their idol’s own words.

How strong feminism movement would be if radical feminists would learn to respect and love everyone, not just those they agree with. There were many things conservative women disagreed with Ginsburg over, yet they didn’t attack her. Instead they did what they could to make a difference.

Attacking Barrett just shows how hate-filled, evil, and angry the radical feminism movement is. Ginsburg is replaced by a woman and instead of supporting her, the movement is seeking to be her demise.

However, from what I’ve seen so far of Barrett, radical feminists don’t stand a chance. Any woman that can raise seven kids and have a full time job while being an exemplary wife doesn’t seem like the kind to be deterred by screaming women in vagina hats.

Brittany Slaughter

View all posts


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Pelosi, judges in the Supreme Court to pass bill for a limitation to 18 years, we need to said Congress needs limited of 12 years and that if fare, they are not doing there job

  • The Senate democrats will expose themselves, especially the females. They couldn’t care less about anyone’s rights when it comes to playing the race card. As to the author of the piece, I cannot recall any mention by the nominee about overturning Roe. I fact, she said she didn’t think it would be overturned.

  • Where are all of the women, who should be supporting this trail blazing woman???
    Where are the meetoomovement women, to defend Amy Cobey Barratt from the men and women attacking Amy Cobey Barratt!!!!
    Where is the media confirming and verifying Amy Cobey Barratt’s resume, instead if trying to attack it and UNJUSTLY tear it appart???

Don’t Let FACEBOOK BLOCK YOU From Seeing Our Posts!

Facebook is doing everything they can to keep you from seeing our content! Please enter your email so we can make sure you see our posts and avoid the CCP owned, MSM propaganda!