Opinion| Mark Sidney| What if the entire Roger Stone indictment was predicated upon an elaborate fraud involving the DNC, Obama’s FBI, DOJ and others?
Yesterday I wrote an article (sorry for the grammar and spelling mistakes, I’m a neanderthal then it comes to those things!) which talked about the theory which suggests that Russia was not the one behind the hack, and subsequent transfer, of the ‘Podesta emails’.
Today, Jim Hoft, owner and proprietor of The Gateway Pundit, wrote much better and much more in depth piece, which I think all of America needs to read.
I encourage everyone to look into this theory. At this point all it is, is a theory, but the people who are asserting this theory are the reason why I personally give it so much credence.
William Binney, former world Technical Director of the NSA and early NSA whistleblower, Anthony Shaffer, former intel operative and whistleblower, as well as famous attorney, Robert Barnes, and many, many other, credible people who are ‘in the know’ are making the same, or similar assertions.
These men are some of my personal heroes, and I think they need to be listened to.
Look, if Mueller and co are correct, why not just prove their assertions?
They want to say it’s obvious, but if it’s not obvious to those with the technical information and knowledge, why should we be forced to accept it on faith alone, and why should Roger Stone be forced to face dying in prison, without the government proving that Russia was Wikileaks’ source?
It’s just not right, and not how American justice was supposed to function. It is however, how American justice HAS been functioning in my view.
“Roger Stone was convicted today on seven counts of process crimes which could put him in prison for the rest of his life.
He’s indicted because corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson did not allow Stone to argue for proof that Russians hacked the DNC server, as was reported in the Mueller report. Stone claimed that if the Russians didn’t hack the DNC, his case would be dismissed, but Judge Jackson wouldn’t let him.
We reported on May 11, 2019, that Roger Stone and his legal team requested the report from Crowdstrike, the firm connected with the Deep State who reportedly did inspect the DNC server after emails were released by WikiLeaks. This report was used by the FBI and the Mueller gang as support that the DNC was hacked by Russia.
Roger Stone is trying to get the Crowdstrike Report. https://t.co/zl7rmEz2NU
— Semi-Casual Observer (@CasualSemi) May 10, 2019
Stone’s position was that if the Mueller team and the FBI did not inspect the DNC server, then how can they know that the server was hacked. This logical argument makes sense –
The chain of custody of evidence is kind of a big deal. If the FBI didn't have custody of the server, and if they never examined it, they cannot verify what happened to the data on it. https://t.co/0PmN50YAmy
— Praying Medic (@prayingmedic) May 10, 2019
The Mueller team fought back against the Stone team and argued that it was not necessary to see the documents that support that Russia hacked the DNC –
If it is "so obvious" the Russian government orchestrated the email disclosures of the 2016 campaign, why are the #Mueller leftovers in the #RogerStone case asking the court to relieve them of that very obligation, saying they should "not be required to prove" that very fact? pic.twitter.com/WdfSzSsvF2
— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) May 10, 2019
We’ve been saying for months that the entire Russia collusion delusion is a sham. To date there has been no information reported that ascertains that the DNC was hacked by the Russians. No reports to date show that the DNC server was inspected by the Mueller team and the FBI. Since this is the case, there is no way the Mueller team can claim the server was hacked.
Since there is no proof that the emails were hacked, the reports that Russians were involved in the collusion delusion evaporate. This would have destroyed the entire Russian sham make-believe case. Our reporting has been confirmed by others in the Intelligence community.
After speaking w/ my @FBI sources & a @nytimes reporter with direct knowledge of the handling of the @DNC server it's true – there was no direct examination or physically custody of the DNC server – an "image" (i.e. copy) of the server was examined only: https://t.co/yDJKCYmUQC
— Tony Shaffer (@T_S_P_O_O_K_Y) May 12, 2019
Next we reported that NSA Whistle blower Bill Binney looked at the DNC data leaked by WikiLeaks and determined that it was definitely not hacked, it was copied to a disk or flash drive.
Former NSA employee and whistle blower, Bill Binney, reviewed the leaked emails provided online and they show that the data coming from the DNC was not hacked but rather copied to a disk or flash drive!
The problem with the Mueller report and the Rosenstein indictment is it’s all based on lies. I mean the fact they’re still lying about the, saying the DNC was hacked by the Russians and the Russians gave it to WikiLeaks.
Well, we had some of our people and our group, the VIPS, the Veteran Intelligence Professionals, look at the data that WikiLeaks posted on the DNC data. They actually posted the DNC data…
…that entire set of data was read to a thumb drive or a CD Rom then physically transported. Now this is what Kim Dotcom is saying. This is what Julian Assange basically was inferring. Others have been saying the same things.”READ MORE HERE
NSA Whistleblower and longtime intelligence analyst Bill Binney on continuation of #RussiaGate fever: "The problem with the Mueller Report & the Rosenstein indictment is it's based on lies."
— Status Coup (@StatusCoup) June 3, 2019
I think this is some compelling testimony.
Again, all we are asking is that the evidence be laid out in a court of law and we analyze the case based on the facts. Period, full stop.
Even my lefty friends, who are honest with themselves and can get out side of their own bubble of thinking (I admit, it is hard for everyone to do this, myself included) admit they think Roger got ‘railroaded.’
Luckily, I think the DS made a HUGE mistake doing this to Roger, as I think this will result in Assange being offered a deal in exchange for the TRUTH about where the emails came from … only time will tell.
What do you think REALLY happened?