Opinion| Mark Sidney| I know the media loves to call this a ‘crazy conspiracy theory,’ but, how come this topic keep coming up, again and again and again?
It seems like the problem of child sexual abuse, trafficking, exploitation and illicit video and images containing children being abused is everywhere these days.
We need look no further than the Clinton’s infamous pall, Jeffrey Epstein for an example. Did you know that Epstein’s flight logs showed President Clinton flying on Epstein’s private jet, dubbed ‘the lolita express,’ at least 26 times, over the course of 6 trips, according to FactCheck.org.
Do you remember when the Clinton State Department allegedly covered up a child pornography issue? Illicit Info remembers:
NBC News back in 6/2013:
“New allegations rocking the State Department involve alleged incidents during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State.
NBC News has obtained documents tied to ongoing investigations at the State Department involving eight cases of alleged misconduct by state department workers, contractors, and a United States ambassador. The incidents reportedly occurred during Hillary Clinton’s tenure, according to the documents.
An internal Inspector General memo from last October reported the ambassador under investigation “routinely ditched his protective security detail in order to solicit sexual favors from both prostitutes and minor children.” The report also states that a high-ranking official at the State Department directed investigators to “cease the investigation.””
Even leftist publications like The Daily Beast (whom I have to hand it to, this site is not afraid to expose wrongdoing on the left too) have published pieces on the issue as well: “The Sickening Child Porn Crisis Infecting U.S. Government Agencies”
The article goes on to state:
“At least 22 current local, state, and federal employees have been convicted of horrific crimes against children. Even worse: There are likely many more of these monsters.
Daniel Rosen, a senior State Department official arrested last month for soliciting sex online with a minor, was reportedly arrested again Sunday night in Washington, D.C., and charged with an earlier crime of voyeurism after police searched his cellphone. And he is only the latest in a long string of government employees to have been accused of crimes against children.
Public records and reports reviewed by The Daily Beast show that at least 22 current and former local, state, and federal employees have been convicted of crimes ranging from distributing child pornography to conscience-shocking acts of violence against infants. The crimes have occurred over the past decade, with many of the cases coming in the past four years. Experts say the numbers are likely far higher and may not be thoroughly documented by law enforcement agencies across the United States. …”
So, before you start calling me a ‘conspiracy theorist,’ look around and realize that three is a problem with child abuse, specifically sexual child abuse, among those in power. I will admit that we do not know the scope of the problem, but we do know that the issue is not limited to just the United States.
Remember Jimmy Saville? Perhaps the world’s more prolific abuser of children, who was chummy with the Royal Family of England. The Daily Star, a UK website, published a piece entitled: “Royal cover up: Police censor Jimmy Savile interview transcript”
The article went on to claim that:
“PAEDOPHILE Jimmy Savile named the royal family in his bombshell interview with police but any mention of them was removed from the released transcripts.”
“Today we can reveal the documents had been vetted by Buckingham Palace – and that the serial sex attacker’s royal connections were removed.
One reference Savile made about a cousin of the Queen was included in an internal police report released in January.
But on Tuesday, when Surrey Police published the interview transcripts, there was no mention of her.
Other references to royalty were also seemingly erased – and during our fight to obtain the records, police let slip Buckingham Palace’s involvement.
Tony Smith, the force’s information access manager, made the reference as he explained why it was taking so long to release the documents.
He told us that, as well as going to a senior police chief outside the force, the papers had gone “to Buckingham Palace to consider…because they are mentioned in it”.
There is no mention of Buckingham Palace or anyone from the royal family in the edited scripts.”
Let’s not kid ourselves that this problem does not exist. It does, and it is a recurring theme I keep stumbling across as I study the power structure and the DS.
Today The Gateway Pundit is reporting that:
“Mark Zaid, one of the lawyers representing CIA leaker Eric Ciaramella, previously bragged about getting security clearances for “guys who had child porn issues.”
Mr. Zaid in 2018 was responding to a fellow lawyer on Twitter who had claimed they helped people with past domestic abuse issues get security clearances.”
“I’ve gotten clearances for guys who had child porn issues,” Zaid responded to an attorney who specializes in helping government employees get security clearances.
“Why would the whistleblower’s lawyer brag about this?” GOP operative Arthur Schwartz tweeted over Zaid.”
Why would the whistleblower’s lawyer brag about this? https://t.co/R8Wz9s81FL
— Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) November 8, 2019
As if that is not odd enough, and troubling to say the least, Mark Zaid is also allegedly a big fan of Disney, not just the company, but the young talent:
TGWP reported: “A YouTube account allegedly belonging to Zaid features 3 ‘liked’ videos, one of which is titled, “Top 10 Disney Girls” and another is titled, “Selena Gomez from child to woman.””
As if this were not creepy enough, photos obtained by The Gateway Pundit (visit their site each day, Jim Hoft, is always over the target with their reporting) show Mark a Disney … alone.
So why is it a big deal that guys ‘with child porn issues’ have security clearances?
Because, that is how people become compromised by adversarial powers. It’s called leverage.
If, lets say, Russia for instance, were to learn of an American intel officer, or anyone with a security clearance’s illegal, societally shunned vice, the hostile power could then lean on that person to provide them with information or, anything they desire really, using the threat of publicly exposing the pedophile for who they really are as leverage.
How about someone starts a damn investigation into how many people who have security clearances are freaking compromised, or have the potential to be compromised with this kind of info?!
Why is it that this common thread keeps reappearing in the crew trying to take out Trump? I’ll leave that to you to figure out…