Connect with us

Uncategorized

Here’s The Warning Through Which We Must View The Democratic Party: Russia

Opinion| Lawrence David| Angelo Codevilla, the noted political scientist, has written an insightful analysis of the history of our relations with Russia.  

Codevilla begins with a discussion of what formed the basis for the Revolution of 1917.  His words are especially cogent as we consider today’s modern Democratic Party’s lurch towards socialism.  

It is a warning worth heeding because it is a glimpse into the soul of what motivates disillusioned/indoctrinated leftists who have been denied important historical perspective by a corrupt educational system and perpetuated by the government-media complex.

That detachment is fed upon by bottom-feeding corrupt politicians intent on enriching themselves with false promises of socialist policies:

The Revolution of 1917 was possible because socialists, in Russia and throughout the Western world, believed that “present-day society,” as Karl Marx put it, is a jumble of “contradictions,” which could be resolved only by tearing down the pillars of the house. Once that was done, history would end: man and woman, farmer and industrial worker, producer and consumer, intellectual and mechanic—heretofore at odds—would live harmoniously, freely, and prosperously ever after.

Because they really believed in this utopian dream, the socialists gave absolute power to Lenin and Stalin’s Communist Party to wreck and reorganize—to break eggs in order to make a delicious omelette. But Communism, while retaining some of Marxism’s antinomian features (e.g., war on the family and on religion), became in practice almost exclusively a justification for the party’s absolute rule. For example, the economic system adopted by the Soviet Union and by other Communist regimes owed precisely zero to Marx, but was a finely tuned instrument for keeping the party in control of wealth.

Follow Illicit Info on Spreely, the social media site for Patriots

The Leninist party is gone forever in Russia because, decades after its leaders stopped believing in Marxism, and after Leonid Brezhnev had freed them from the Stalinist incubus that had kept them loyal to the center, they had learned to make the party into a racket…

…Russian men learned to intrigue and drink on the job rather than work. Shunning responsibility for women and children, they turned Russian society into a matriarchy, held together by grandmothers. In a thoroughly bureaucratized system, each holder of a bit of authority used it to inconvenience the others. Forcing people to tell each other things that both knew not to be true—recall that “politically correct” is a Communist expression—engendered cynicism and disrespect for truth. The endless anti-religion campaigns cut the people off from one moral system and failed to inculcate another. Alcohol drowned unhappiness, life expectancies declined, and fewer Russians were born.

Visit Illicit Info's homepage for more stories

The Russian people rejected Communism in the only ways that powerless people can—by passivity, by turning to anything foreign to authority, and by cynicism. Nothing being more foreign to Communism than Christianity, Russians started wearing crosses, knowing that the regime frowned on this feature of the Russia that had pre-existed Communism, and would survive it.

While the article is much longer and covers a number of significant issues relevant to the current geopolitical climate, Codevilla’s opening passage captures the “burn it down” ignorance of today’s liberal movement.

Loading...
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Loading...

Trending On Illicit Info

To Top