Mark Sidney’s Opinion| We talk a lot about Fox News on IllicitInfo. However, recently most of what we have been talking about is not good.
First was the hiring of former DNC Chairwoman, who admitted to giving Hillary Clinton debate questions ahead of time. Sounds outrageous, that surely can’t be true right? Don’t take my word for it, listen to Wikipedia:
“A WikiLeaks e-mail dump revealed that Brazile sent an e-mail message on March 5, 2016, to John Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri with the title: “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash.” The message continued, “her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint.” At the next event in Flint, Clinton was delivered a similar question from audience member Mikki Wade, whose family was affected by the poisoned water.
On October 11, 2016, a WikiLeaks e-mail dump included an e-mail Brazile sent on March 12 to Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri with the subject header: “From time to time I get questions in advance.“ In the e-mail, Brazile discussed her concern about Clinton’s ability to field a question regarding the death penalty, and in a CNN town hall debate the following day, Clinton received a similar question about the death penalty.
According to tech blog Errata Security, the e-mail in question was verified using an everyday verification program and the DKIM system. Brazile at first vehemently denied receiving or furnishing the Clinton campaign with any town hall questions and dismissed the Wikileaks organization as “these sad ass whipper leakers try to slow my groove”. She accused TYT Politics reporter Jordan Chariton of “badgering a woman.”
Questioned by Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, Brazile said, “As a Christian woman, I understand persecution. I will not sit here and be persecuted because your information is totally false.”
Jake Tapper, a former colleague of Brazile’s at CNN, provided his perspective on the possibility of a leak of a question to a Presidential candidate, calling it “very, very upsetting” and added that “journalistically, it’s horrifying“. Brazile, however, said that her conscience was “very clear”. She later commented: “If I had to do it all over again, I would know a hell of a lot more about cybersecurity.”“
From where I sit, this sure feels like Fox is gearing up to join the other major networks and take Trump out in 2020, but hey, that’s just like, my opinion, man.
What do I know right? It’s not like the current Fox hosts are running defense for Trump’s opponents …. right? Wrong.
Judge Andrew Napolitano, a man with whom I used to agree, and watched religiously when he had a show on Fox Business back in the day, has come out to claim that there is ‘no there, there.’
In full disclosure, Napolitano’s show covered a story my family was involved in years ago. Like I said, I used to be a huge fan.
Breitbart has more:
Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano said Tuesday on “Fox & Friends” that there was “no there there,” on 2020 Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden’s Ukraine business ties.
Co-host Ainsley Earhardt asked, “What happens with Joe Biden and his son? Are they going to open that up investigation on both of them?”
Napolitano said, “You know, it depends on who you talk to. If you talk to Rudy Giuliani, he has a lot of evidence of inappropriate behavior by the former vice president and his son. Yet, the prosecutors in Ukraine and even prosecutors here in the United States say there’s no there there.”
Hmm, dear Judge, what’s this:
Well, that’s funny because Biden said he never discussed his son’s business with him. That doesn’t seem plausible to me, but what do I know, right? I mean who talks about the one thing you all have in common while golfing?
Or this …
I’m sure you’ve seen this clip of Biden bragging about getting the prosecutor who was allegedly looking into the company which his son sat on the board of, Burisma Holdings. Many on the left say this clip has been debunked … I have not seen the math on the debunking, if you have it email me using the contact form on the site please.
Still no there, there? Well how about the SWORN testimony of the fired Prosecutor?
You should read the whole affidavit, but here is one part that stood out to me. Now remember this is a SWORN affidavit from the man who was in the arena, the man who was fired:
So, here is where I say, hey this is only evidence, no one has been proven guilty of anything YET. However, I believe that there is at least enough here to open and investigation to let the truth come to light.
If Biden were in fact innocent, would he not want his name cleared? After all, I have to think most people who see this would assume there is some “there, there” and if there is not, I know I would want my chance to tell my side of the story.
It seems to me there are two sets of rules in Washington, one for everyone trying to destroy Trump, and another for those defending him. AJ was right when he said “this is an [email protected]” This is why they are slashing our reach in my opinion.
We show the facts and present the evidence and OPINIONS, which counter their false narratives, at least we try to. BTW I hope to see you on Spreely.com, the social media site where we can speak freely. My profile is “Liberating Elder“, send me a friend request!