Illicit Info’s Speculation Analysis and POV Based Off A Ny Post Article: In a story that has gone relatively ignored by the mainstream media, the New York Post makes a startling admission about the potential fallout from Prince Andrew’s ‘friendship’ with pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
(NY Post) British spymasters now worry Russia may have obtained scandal-related “kompromat” on the randy royal.
Incriminating evidence of the prince’s alleged 2001 tryst with then-17-year-old Epstein “slave” Virginia Giuffre could be in Russian hands, fears MI6, the British intelligence service.
That raises the question, which other high-profile politicos Russia could be holding kompromat on?
Initial mainstream media reporting came from ABC News:
Aside from naming Prince Andrew, ABC News also named former Clinton cabinet member Bill Richardson, and former Senate Majority Leader, Democrat George Mitchell as potential participants in Epstein’s crimes.
The ABC News report went further than that, flatly declaring that many more powerful politicians and business executives were involved:
How much more powerful and influential than the Senate Majority Leader and a Clinton cabinet member, at least as far as politicians are concerned, are there? I can think of one.
Conchita Sarnoff is executive director of the Alliance To Rescue Victims of Trafficking. Ms. Sarnoff has been covering the Epstein scandal for more than a decade:
Sarnoff: “I know from the pilot logs. And these were pilot logs that were written by different pilots at different times, that Clinton went, he was a guest of Epstein twenty-seven times…
“… Many of those times Clinton had his Secret Service with him and, many he did not. Almost every time that Clinton’s name is on the pilot log, there are underage girls.”
If Russians are in possession of kompromat on this level, it could possibly explain why Secretary of State Hillary Clinton approved the sale of Uranium One to Russia as well as authorizing the transfer of cyber technology to the Skolkovo project as I understand it.
It would also explain why Putin never disavowed the phony dossier story. He potentially wanted Clinton to win so that the kompromat would remain viable.
This tweet from Christine Pelosi, House Speaker Pelosi’s daughter, takes on new meaning:
This Epstein case is horrific and the young women deserve justice. It is quite likely that some of our faves are implicated but we must follow the facts and let the chips fall where they may – whether on Republicans or Democrats. #WeSaidEnough #MeToo https://t.co/2mvskwQwW1
— Christine Pelosi (@sfpelosi) July 7, 2019
“It is quite likely that some of our faves are implicated” – Pelosi
Prince Andrew, George Mitchell, and Bill Richardson are no one’s ‘faves.’
Just asking for a friend.