TRAITOR: Amy Barrett Approves Vaccine Mandate, Refuses to Explain


Syndicated Via National File| JACK HADFIELD|

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the last appointment to the Supreme Court by President Donald Trump, summarily denied a case from eight students of Indiana University who were challenging their institution’s vaccine mandate

Barrett, with no explanation, turned away the emergency injunction request from the students, who argued that the vaccine mandate from Indiana University violated their constitutional rights. Acting in her role as the Circuit Justice for the Seventh Circuit, which includes Indiana, acted alone, and denied the request to send it on to the Supreme Court without even asking the university to file a response to the petition. The case would have been the first time that SCOTUS examined the constitutionality of vaccine mandates.

Indiana University had announced their vaccine mandate in May, with all students, staff and faculty being forced to take the vaccine, or suffer “strong consequences,” which amount to “virtual expulsion,” including cancelling class registration and restriction from on-campus activity. Exemptions are offered but are “extremely limited,” including religious exemptions. However, those exempt are forced to be tested twice a week for COVID-19 and wear facemasks in all public spaces.

In court papers, the students argued that they have “legitimate concerns including underlying medical conditions, having natural antibodies, and the risks associated with the vaccine,” further highlighting that all of them are adults who are “entitled to make their own medical treatment decisions, and have a constitutional right to bodily integrity, autonomy, and of medical treatment choice.” In enforcing the vaccine mandate, the university is “treating its students as children who cannot be trusted to make mature decisions,” the papers continue.

An amicus brief submitting by the group Physicians for Informed Consent highlighted that there is “no evidence that any of the currently available… vaccines prevent the spread” of COVID-19 and that there is evidence that the disease spreads “in spite of vaccination.” The real case for Barrett taking it to the Supreme Court and not leaving it to lower courts was because they did not act on the “heightened scrutiny” needed to examine a case which contained the potential infringement of highly important rights.

A Federal Appeals Court had previously backed the actions of Indiana University, with Judge Frank Easterbrook citing a case from 1905 that gave states the power to mandate smallpox vaccinations, and argued that anyone who didn’t want to get vaccinated “may go elsewhere” for their education, with “ample educational opportunities” available to them.

About Staff Writer

Black Eagle August 13, 2021
| |
So if Big Govt says Amy Barrett needs a forced abortion, that's OK as well? 
Dean August 13, 2021
| |
The youngest addition to the Cabal. Satin always diquises himself as an angel
Desert Dweller August 13, 2021
| |
Does this ignorant bitch consign HER kids to have to live in a marxist country?  she is a disgrace!!!
Ivan August 13, 2021
| |
She's a typical lying catholic, what did you expect. All in the District of Corruption are in on the NWO plan and getting paid off or for the very few that still have morals, threatened into compliance. The catholic (demonic) majority of the SC is the reason for refusing to hear Trump's cases...They'll do anything regardless of legality to protect one of their own...Beijing Bidet
John Beach August 13, 2021
| |
This makes as much sense as mandating the vaccine for all catholics, but exempting protestants, based on the definition of terms.  😇
Poppy Lord August 13, 2021
| |
If you were looking for a way to earn some extra income every week... Look no more!!!! Here is a great opportunity for everyone to make $95/per hour by working in your free time on your computer from home... I've been doing this for 6 months now and last month i've earned my first five-figure paycheck ever!!!! Learn more about it on following link...>>> Www.Webcash1.Com
Rosebud August 13, 2021
| |
President Trump had good intentions but, he never knew that there were so many Wolves in Sheeps clothing. I can't believe that there are so many people that detest the thought of FREEDOM and hate AMERICA.
Deborah August 13, 2021
| |
She is disgusting!  Mandates are WRONG AND UNLAWFUL!  I will NEVER comply!
Tiger Elliott August 13, 2021
| |
It seems like every body Trump endorses turns out to be a big time Communist Rat Fink.I do not think there are any good people left.And the rest of the people Trump is wanting us to vote for in 22 are most likely scumbags to.What I really want to know is WHERE THE HELL IS OUR MILITARY? Are they in on this communist take over to?As a Vietnam Marine I just can't see any Marine turning on his own people and country?
THX 1138 August 13, 2021
| |
Another bought and paid for turncoat!
Margie Tiritilli August 13, 2021
| |
This woman is as Conservative as Maxine Waters.  She's a gutless wonder who runs from anything that's controversial.  She obviously thinks of herself so high-and-mighty that she doesn't have to give an answer as to why she's acted in such a cowardly way.  Her reasoning speaks volumes, she doesn't have an excuse so hides under her bed leaving the studenta stranded with little or no recourse regarding the mandated vaccinations.  
David August 13, 2021
| |
Even if they threatened her family,she could go pubic, but to give no explanation is plain cowardice.