Obama’s AG, Loretta Lynch, Facing Over A Decade In Prison After She Is Caught Lying To Congress & Obstructing Justice According To Lisa Page.
Opinion | A major bombshell has been dropped since the release of the transcripts from Lisa Page’s closed door testimony, revealing that the Obama DOJ advised the FBI not to charge Hillary Clinton with “gross negligence.”
Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information when she used a private email server from her home while serving as Secretary of State should have landed her in prison.
The statute says:
f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1)through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
The statute says “any document,” not only classified documents, and the word “intent” never shows up in any of the language of this statute.
The fact that they claim they didn’t have enough evidence to charge Hillary with “gross negligence” is deceiving.
The truth that has been dropped in Lisa Page’s testimony is that the Obama DOJ urged the bias FBI not to pursue charges against Hillary Clinton for her obvious “gross negligence.”
Instead they changed “gross negligence” to “extremely careless,” thinking they could pull the wool over America’s eyes and fool them into thinking that would change the meaning and wouldn’t trigger the statute.
Now we know for a fact that the Obama DOJ and their acting Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, pushed the FBI to ignore Hillary Clinton’s crimes. The testimonies of Lisa Page and Andrew McCabe both prove this to be true.
In 2016, Loretta Lynch testified under oath saying, “I made the decision, some time ago, that I would accept the recommendation of that team. When I received it, there was no basis not to accept it, and again I reiterate my pride and faith in them.”
This all followed the infamous tarmac meeting Lynch had with Bill Clinton.
Lynch also said, “I met with … career prosecutors and agents who conducted that investigation. I received and accepted their unanimous recommendation. I received the recommendation of the team, and that team was composed of prosecutors and agents. With the unanimous recommendation as to how to resolve the investigation, and what the information that they had received… I accepted that recommendation. I saw no reason not to accept it.”
It’s obvious that Lynch was urged by many to accept the recommendation to not pursue the charges and it wasn’t based on her “pride and faith” in that team.
Davidharrisjr.com explains, “if we are to believe the testimony of Lisa Page that the DOJ had already ordered the FBI not to charge Clinton for her crimes, was Lynch not committing perjury when she testified that she would accept whatever recommendation the FBI made, even though her department had already ordered the FBI not to charge Clinton?”
Cornell Law: “18 U.S.C. § 1503 defines “obstruction of justice” as an act that “corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice.”
According to this, not only did Lynch lie in front of Congress, but she also obstructed justice when she chose to tell the FBI not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for her gross negligence.